No. 18-807
Randolph S. Baskins, et ux. v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: capital-gains commerce-clause constitutional-law dormant-commerce-clause due-process equal-protection state-taxation tax-deduction
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the Oklahoma Capital Gains Deduction tax scheme as set forth in 68 O.S. 2011, § 2358(F) as applied to Randolph S. Baskins and Beverly J. Baskins violate the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Does the Oklahoma Capital Gains Deduction tax scheme as set forth in 68 O.S. 2011, § 2358(F) as applied to Randolph S. Baskins and Beverly J. Baskins violate the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution?
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-23
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-08
Brief of respondent Oklahoma Tax Commission in opposition filed.
2019-02-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 8, 2019.
2019-02-22
Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 8, 2019 to April 8, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-02-06
Response Requested. (Due March 8, 2019)
2019-01-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-17
Waiver of right of respondent Oklahoma Tax Commission to respond filed.
2018-12-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 22, 2019)
Attorneys
Oklahoma Tax Commission
Mithun Mansinghani — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth Jean Field — Oklahoma Tax Commission, Respondent
Randolph S. Baskins, et ux.
Thomas G. Ferguson Jr. — Walker, Ferguson & Ferguson, Petitioner