Whether the trial court and the Georgia Supreme Court abused their discretion by failing to reach the merits of petitioner's out-of-time appeal

No question identified. : ‘ Quéestien © PAESEATED ) whether, THE Taal Court avd The Geor Gin Supreme Cover Aguse THERE piscrea fie ol Fa\livg To REACH Ihe mectts ok peririor ER ovr ~OF “TIME pypeal Awd: ners, The GEERGIA Supreme Com AlosSE 1F pisces! Dismissmy pebhevess ovy-GF~ Time AYDEAL AS atsenely When Clearly The petherer Gled ATimety ost of Tne KPpPEAl » 7 whether, ThE TRinrt Cov RT Awd Tre Georom SHREMG CevhX AWSe There Oiscreariog Fa Weory to CoA dscr AN Evidemri ay hEARMs AS to Whe Bote The RESpers! bi (Ty Gor FArwre fo Rie A pimeiy 499e4r. 3 wWhethe, PEt heen Withdraw Guilby PLEA frEaRmy ws Unicon sre renal Where, The TRIAL Cont FAS) bd \n Foe the PENiriev et OF The haa now paaw Guilty pLe®, Aad Fay ro Appesee inser Goa, The Wtaarag NET Dip The TIAL Cour INGUiCewWiveier’ peashre fen WANE is ayy TO Cows. Ave wih elphew Tha TRIAL Coc’ ERROR Fationg pe IFS The pebibysnce of Wis Piqhy To Directly APPEAL his Wi Dea SV OXY par IALS Fiest inibar REVIEW COWRTER AL PeCeedi tg / W) Whrekbe A Withptay Gully ples guarcty AS & Ceiricnu SMe. ok Oi MINA pre Secu Kien Awd The Wignt Jo Cowmser AMAH CH A DE Cen daan?? Firsye wrhauReview COW SERA proceeding ° Y Whether, Georgia’d Hatehs CoRpos STAVE Ls UNCON STUTioNAL Barring pEritionER of Wis Consiga Righs To File Aw Ovb-OF -TIMG Appeal AT A Later Date cr A CLAIM OF INEFFECTIVE AgSSimlE OF Carnstl , BEAOSE {nt peri reo ens Foes Initial REVTEW CollaYecal pyo~ Ceeding ow nis With DiAw Guill pia The penyrowee Dip per Mave Counsel ANA THETRAL COURT FALL INQUnce Whethen The pefhibnae WAIVE nis Robr TD CevoSEL, aad The TRIAL Court FAI Te tet The 0eH he H€e O © Lig Right's TO APPEAL. IN GEeaGra Mee passage oF ines ‘Does Nek Preven A Defend at FROM FAAay Anli-OUT OE Time am Appént At A LATER bate 7 LE The DeFendants Rrgwhs To A ppent las lezen Frvotvated TO no Cauit oF is OWA , AvA whether, MAcHNEZ VW RyAs, A PerY To GEoeein® Aq Beas Compys SYRTIVE AS Reang Urry GOASTUTVONAL » BECAOSE Tan united SPIES Supreme Cover WElo where mde Stare Law INERENVE ASSTSHANCE OF TRIAL CeuenseL Claim yWrvsT Be RAISED LN AN TNIHAL REVIEN CollarecaAl pvuCeediny, A procedura, deCauit wil) Not bac A Feder (hasty Couar FRom WEAR Those Claims (EF iN tAG J ipeaL Review CowATecal pre Ceeaire THERE WAS No Counscl OR in TAAL prce<eatny Counnskt was INGGecti ve , §