Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's civil rights claims due to failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), despite the petitioner's allegations of fear of retaliation and inability to access the grievance process

No question identified. : Queshon(s) Pesented 2 of-] Ado 07) 7) — Persertality Aint aS the. honorable. Tudge Crosset? states is my delan/fS a) Does tal ed teh £ filed becuse of fear yy of losm4 tee reqght-to present the"on-(ne linchin. Guhich ok fedea/ Crive) mean anytung to Hie PL. bd. 4. © Did not one oe Cheige Pause all Pas € b) Does tre BL. RA. uncerStand what it bee /S lice to be beat halfle death by tre men preyed to a SO ard fo be ham lbded 42 cleat ord WalleiN thar hum liaho_— +o leke (tal condo gyn bom 1 qareptere ti eget | C) rete Pe. tale gnshtehorel! ft rf. allows SLED. Due to Securty thwct Buls ~ to twist poy and Conditbens To sond 4 arievane to "Pole SewvieeS and not tee Md2 wimétrahne. Cau Court ¥ Doesnt thsShow Somefnna ; 4 VC Wosk vehene ® 13-0094 4 bb Titled Confer Polite Services iS a AMS OF S,L.E Pe KPobabAA, rc venee Saderegt veseonse Dates Wes /Zo]8" Jo:04 Am. Author 2 0475015 " You’ qvievant_weS processed and returned + You Ofc You had exceeded tre he fame for pag fad J en C. Nbsp./'ttard not meth fre Standards ee Services"