Did the State of Georgia err and violate the Petitioner's constitutional rights by upholding a statute that lacks an essential element of the crime charged, thereby depriving the Petitioner of due process and equal protection under the law?

ESTIONS PRESEMTED ——T} Did The Stee ab Gaugia ere, aad law — . RS pitt. Count of Creatsio by Uphaldiag Libe. it TAL y. Concludes thet ‘the Sate QL CO eagie. : ea By wuizel > Malle. any Sficetal alla t, a jot iacteae in Fare tiea The State 2t Leen Lilia Ms INE Sate of Glas, , (Unpublished) (7s there. guestonasle la tea dace there hres Po LE GUIS ive Clemanxr QL. tat bz ZZ. Noe Clemazr of oo Crine)' CA Ne re Ssacy (legis lective dekinel elerene OXCcatioaa! ty whe ‘I Ota tute O 0-5-7 /, C2 amend x: lessertal Clements. Ye the AssalS portion __ mi ch 1s one ot the elements esse, tal to Lys | VAmendmear and (11 7») FaUC tee ath, Aariad dene __ foe TA W, ites St: te_S Const ty ga Ted Has SJ bsta,tve Jue PDLESS ahts Lee, vcalate) WARS. Mba by Attémpetins At, Commit ca Violex it : ply is S the substi, Le Qorar at thy issue (4 value, Li the St, Cafe Since the aSaugle as det ned unde le Atenoe theely (tL per Qeagin', ¢ baracdé Spre ists Aitendmont athe radeon boo). -rov 4