Whether the circuit justice supplanted the COA screening procedure with a merits analysis

issues presented are adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further. Buck v. Davis, 580 U.S. ___, 137 S. Ct. 759, 197 L. Ed. 2d 1 (2017)(quoting Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327, 123 S. Ct. 1029, 1034, 154 L. Ed. 2d 931 (2003). . . , In addition, under the same premise of such screening, the circuit justice or judge limits its primary threshold inquiry, as to the merits analysis of each claim, without a full consideration of the factual bases adduced in support ; of the claims. Id. 137 S. Ct. 759. Under this’ syllogism, did the circuit justice for The , Eleventh Circuit supplant an ersatz screening COA procedure, I. not in comport with Supreme Court precedent, when it fully considered the facts and legal bases of Appellant's claims request for a COA, and thus ultimately ruling on the merits of each claim, as denied by the district court? Il.