No. 18-811
JPay, Inc. v. Cynthia Kobel, et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: arbitrability arbitrability-delegation arbitration-agreement class-arbitration contract-interpretation contractual-language dispute-resolution oxford-health-plans parties-intentions presumption stolt-nielsen stolt-nielsen-presumption
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
May courts presume parties intended to let an arbitrator decide if class arbitration is available when they "simply agree[d] to submit" disputes over arbitrability "to an arbitrator?"
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether courts may presume parties intended to let an arbitrator decide if class arbitration is available when they 'simply agree[d] to submit' disputes over arbitrability 'to an arbitrator?
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-26
Reply of petitioner JPAY, INC. filed.
2019-03-13
Brief of respondents Cynthia Kobel, et al. in opposition filed.
2019-02-14
Response Requested. (Due March 18, 2019)
2019-02-06
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/22/2019.
2019-02-06
Letter of February 5, 2019 from counsel for petitioner received. (Distributed)
2019-01-23
Waiver of right of respondents CYNTHIA KOBEL, et al. to respond filed.
2018-12-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 25, 2019)
Attorneys
CYNTHIA KOBEL, et al.
Karla Ann Gilbride — Public Justice, P.C., Respondent
JPAY, INC.
Devin Matthew Freedman — Boies Schiller & Flenxer, Petitioner