Whether this Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts and Bullcoming v. New Mexico created a bright line rule excluding the testimony of an individual regarding the results or subject of a test or analysis, other than the person who administered the test and authored the report or opinion on the subject

QUESTIONS PRESENTED I. Whether this Court's decision in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts, 557 U.S. 305, 129 S.Ct. 2527 (2009) and Bullcoming v. New Mexico, 564-U:S. 647, 131 S.Ct. 2705 (2011), created a bright line rule excluding the testimony ‘ ; of an individual regarding the results or subject of a test or analysis, other than the person who administered the test and authored the report or opinion on the subject. : II. Whether the Ninth Circuit's use of an individual's testimony involving the , the results of or subject of an analysis or report andministered ad auth. ored by another person. : ii ;