No. 18-8113
Troy Arnaud v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: attorney-client client-autonomy constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel right-to-testify self-representation sixth-amendment trial-counsel
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment
DueProcess FifthAmendment
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Arnand was denied his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Whether Arnand was denied his constitutional right to the effective assistance of counsel. . 2) Whether Arnaud’s trial counsel violated client autonomy. 3) Whether Arnaud was denied his constitutional right to testify on his own behaif. ii
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-03-01
Waiver of right of respondent Darrel Vannoy, Warden to respond filed.
2018-09-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Vannoy, Warden
Terry M. Boudreaux — District Attorney's Office, Respondent
Terry M. Boudreaux — District Attorney's Office, Respondent