No. 18-8114
Anthony Boyd v. Joe D. Driver, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-action civil-procedure civil-rights due-process evidence government-transparency legal-standing material-fact standing summary-judgment transparency video-evidence
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Lack Of Transparency Of Video Evidence By The Government, Standing Alone, Creates A Genuine Issue Of Material Fact In A Civil Action?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED ; Whether Lack Of Transparency Of Video Evidence By The Government, Standing Alone, Creates A Genuine Issue Of Material Fact In A Civil Action? : i
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-03-05
Waiver of right of respondent Joe D. Driver, et al. to respond filed.
2018-10-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2019)
Attorneys
Anthony Boyd
Anthony Boyd — Petitioner
Joe D. Driver, et al.
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent