No. 18-8119
Walter Douglas Jenkins v. Israel Hamilton, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-law criminal-procedure due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-counsel standing waiver
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Was the petitioner denied by the United States Court of Appeals a prima facie of Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment due process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED IZ) WAS Tite PET Tiaven DEMED BY THE UNTIED STATES COURT OL APPEALS A PRIMA PACTE QE SIXTH AND FOMZTE EN ity REM DUNE GW N18 COUNSEL IN LiABZAS (aaPuS AF INEFFECTIVE (OUNSEL ING US PEED TRIAL, WAIVER. Grievance Office ‘ 7 fa )
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent Israel Hamilton to respond filed.
2019-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 28, 2019)
Attorneys
Israel Hamilton
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Toby Jay Heytens — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent