No. 18-8125

Darrell D. Walker v. United States

Lower Court: Eighth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-25
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Amici (1)Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: 28-usc-2255 circuit-court-split criminal-defendant district-court-judgment federal-criminal-procedure federal-statutory-provision original-judgment record-silent retroactive-constitutional-decision second-successive-motion statutory-provision
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-06-13 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a criminal defendant is entitled to relief under a retroactive constitutional decision invalidating a federal statutory provision, where the record is silent on the basis of the original judgment

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, or under what circumstances, a criminal defendant pursuing a second or successive motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is entitled to relief under a retroactive constitutional decision invalidating a federal statutory provision, where the record is silent as to whether the district court based its original judgment on that provision or another provision of the same statute.

Docket Entries

2019-06-17
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/13/2019.
2019-05-28
Reply of petitioner Darrell Walker filed. (Distributed)
2019-05-15
Brief of respondent United States of America in opposition filed.
2019-04-15
Brief amici curiae of FAMM & The National Association of Crimnal Defense Lawyers filed.
2019-04-10
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 15, 2019.
2019-04-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 15, 2019 to May 15, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-03-15
Response Requested. (Due April 15, 2019)
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-03-08
Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Darrell Walker
2019-03-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2019)

Attorneys

Darrell Walker
Dan GoldbergFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
Dan GoldbergFederal Public Defender, Petitioner
FAMM & The National Association of Crimnal Defense Lawyers
Brian Philip GoldmanOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Amicus
Brian Philip GoldmanOrrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Amicus
United States of America
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent