No. 18-8130
Eduardo Segoviano-Briseno v. United States
Tags: consideration contract-law criminal-procedure defendant-rights due-process federal-courts judicial-interpretation legal-consideration plea-agreement plea-bargaining sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether principles of contract law require consideration (benefit to the defendant) to support a valid plea agreement
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Issue Presented 1. Whether principles of contract law require consideration (benefit to the defendant) to support a valid plea agreement. i
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-03-04
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2019)
Attorneys
Eduardo Segoviano-Briseno
John Andrew Kuchera — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
John Andrew Kuchera — Attorney at Law, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent