Whether the minors consent for the interception of wire communication is legally and constitutionally valid, when secured by police acting outside of their home state jurisdiction, violating the visited state's wiretap act prohibiting a minor from consenting?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED I. WHETHER THE MINORS CONSENT FOR THE INTERCEPTION OF: WIRE COMMUNICATION Is LEGALLY AND CONSTITUTIONALLY VALID, WHEN SECURED BY POLICE ACTING OUTSIDE OF THEIR HOME STATE JURISDICTION, VIOLATING THE VISITED STATE’S WIRETAP ACT PROHIBITING A MINOR FROM CONSENTING? Il. WHETHER POLICE CONDUCT OUTSIDE OF THEIR HOME STATE JURISDICTION IS REASONABLE UNDER THE 47 AMENDMENT WHEN OFFICERS COMMIT FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS UNDER THE VISITED STATE’S WIRETAP ACT PRIOR TO THE INTERCEPTS? i