Whether the lower court's order denying the petitioner's request for a fair review of court and jury proceedings violated the petitioner's constitutionally secured rights to due-process, equal-protection, free-speech, 6th-amendment, fair-trial, and fundamental-fairness in the criminal proceedings, and whether the court erred in denying the petitioner's request to rediscover evidence to support their claims in lieu of applying the standard for appellate review of the conviction and sentence.

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED de lowar Hie orden 6€ Proviug tut AU RTO eSoreewrewt’ we order de blotesra counictinr, ewrilfor a Fair Vee. of coud ad Bir audd Violaktour 0F Hie. UEKA. Lat, Hele, Geir, aud Aa, Coustilotionally Secured req wks ° di eect SyudardL tv wy k2.0 CUA Budaweat ally Flared. Proceeding; Aud ddl Lee tat Reditcouer Pre 6 dorake do Wolte dd / iu lien of APF cua Ute cere het te, lor, avd dHaw, Cevelebotovelly secured riqlets? | il.