Did the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit improperly deny a Certificate of Appealability (COA), violating due process in a manner that conflicts with relevant decisions of Supreme Court, endoring a castastrophic fundamental miscarriage of justice?

QUESTION PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Did the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit improperly deny a Certificate of Appealability (COA), violating due process in a manner that conflicts with relevant decisions of Supreme Court, endoring a castastrophic fundamental miscarriage of justice? 2. Did the Court of Appeals and District Court of Northern Texas improperly deny the petitioner's COA without addressing his motion, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion to vacate his ; conviction based on Supreme Courts ruling in Strickland v. Washington, arrising from prejudice by multiple instances of ineffective assistance of counsel? 3. Did the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit impose and unduly burdensome COA standard contravening the Supreme Courts decisions, leading toa constitutional crisis? 4. Did the Court of Appeal violate due process with denial of evidentiary hearing when the Court simultanevasly denied the petitioner motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. motion purely on procedural grounds when not addressing the merits of the underlying constitutional question, even when the Government requested a hearing?