HabeasCorpus
Whether the Ninth Circuit's decision conflicts with other circuit courts and Supreme Court precedent on the issue of actual conflict between a defendant and his trial attorney
QUESTION PRESENTED This case presents an issue on which the Ninth Circuit’s has both (1) entered a decision in conflict with the decisions of two other United States Courts of Appeals on the same important matter, and (2) has decided an important question of federal law that has not been, but should be, settled by this Court. Specifically, the Ninth Circuit’s decision regarding the actual conflict between Mr. Wagner and his trial attorney is based on the Ninth Circuit’s 1994 case of United States v. Hanoum, 33 F.3d 1128 (9 Cir. 1994), which itself conflicts with the D.C. Circuit’s case of United States v. Torres, 115 F.3d 1033 (D.C. Cir. 1997) and the Tenth Circuit’s case of United States v. Johnson, 12 F.3d 1540 (10 Cir. 1993). It also conflicts with the United States Supreme Court cases of Cuyler v. Sullivan, 446 U.S. 335 (1980) and Mickens v. Taylor, 535 U.S. 162 (2002). ii