No. 18-8167
Frederick H. Banks v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals civil-procedure civil-rights competency due-process error-correction indian-law standing tribal-sovereignty
Latest Conference:
2019-03-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Appeals Court err in failing to find that sound reasons existed for filing the error correction motion?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Dis the APpouvs Court err jn failing +> fond tar" Sound Reasons CHI" for Filing the Error Corton Wobts Perron? Did he Appoavs Court rr in filing 0 apply fe Indian Caren ef LonSdruchen of Men tina v. Black eet Tribe, YI US. 154 0198S)? td fe Appears lor enn im fosling Jo find treat Due Preces/ Was vislated by : fee puter Lowe foiline, te Aypomr a bverlun ad lten, for Bonkja : declared Da competent” ‘
Docket Entries
2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2019)
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent