Whether petitioner's constitutional right to effective assistance of counsel was violated

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. WHETHER: PETITIONER'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT!TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WAS VIOLATED BY HIS TRIAL ATTORNEY'S FAILURE TO MOVE THE"DISTRICT COURT TO DISMISS THE: INDICTMENT BY THE GOVERNMENT'S PRESENTMENT’OF FALSE TESTIMONY TO THE GRAND JURY THROUGHHAN ADMISSION? 2. WHETHER? RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL WAS VIOLATED BY HIS TRIAL ATTORNEY FAILURE TO CALL FOR MISTRIAL AS TESTIMONY OF AGENT HAUSE WAS TOTALLY FALSE WHERE THE AFFIDAVIT AS TESTIFIED PROVED ITS*S FALSEHOOD BASED SOLELY ON AN UNCORROBORATED EXTRAJUDICIAL ADMISSION? i