Corinthian Bostic v. United States
CriminalProcedure Privacy
Did the pre-trial judge abuse its discretion by denying Bostic's appointed attorney's motion to withdraw where Bostic and his trial counsel had a conflict of interest?
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Did the pre-trial judge abuse its discretion by denying Bostic’s appointed attorney’s motion to withdraw where Bostic and his trial counsel had a conflict of interest? ‘ 2. During a pre-trial hearing, did the judge err by not informing the defendant of his rightto appeal when the motion to withdraw was denied? 3. Did pre-trial judge violate Bostic’s fifth amendment right to due process by denying justice to the poor when he stated “If you were a wealthy man, you could have as many lawyers as you could persuade to come into it. But we have protection for those who are indigent. We choose lawyers for them. 4, Was ineffective assistance. rendered when the trial attorney withdrew the motion to suppress rather than comply with the judge’s order? 5. Did Bostic’s trial counsel provide ineffective assistance by not giving a reason for withdrawing the motion to suppress, and if a reason was provided, was the reason valid? 6. Who has the right to continue with the suppression motion, the attorney or the defendant? 7. Did Bostic’s trial attorney provide ineffective assistance by failing to request court records and transcripts pertaining to his case from the lower courts? 8. Did the trial counsel provide ineffective assistance when he did not comply with the . defendants request to appeal for a new trial? 9. Was the defendant’s fifth amendenment right to due process violated when his trial attorney failed to inform him before trial that he would be charged until the Armed Career Criminal Act? 10. Did the appellant attorney err by not filing a reply to the government’s brief? ) eee . ese0eee .