Should meritorious actual innocence claims in non-capital Habeas Corpus filings overcome all procedural hurdles and be afforded at least one full and fair hearing on the merits?

Does the failure of a minority of the Circuits to include the miscarriage of justice exception to the Savings Clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 violate the Due Process rights of petitioners with meritorious actual innocence claims?

Should the narrow interpretation of what constitutes an obstruction be broadened to include the miscarriage of justice exception as it applies to meritorious actual innocence claims?

Should the word "Opportunity" be changed to "a Ruling on the Merits" when the Savings Clause is applied to meritorious actual innocence claims?

Should meritorious actual innocence claims in non-capital Habeas Corpus filings overcome all procedural hurdles and be afforded at least one full and fair hearing on the merits?