No. 18-8190

Edgar Alonso Pineda-Pineda v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-02-28
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 8-usc-1326 almendarez-torres-v-united-states apprendi-v-new-jersey criminal-procedure due-process indictment prior-conviction sentencing sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-03-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a prior conviction must be alleged in the indictment before a defendant is subjected to enhanced punishment under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Whether this Court should consider the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 244 (1998), in light of the reasoning of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000). 2. Whether a prior conviction must be alleged in the indictment before a defendant is subjected to enhanced punishment under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b). No. In the Supreme Court of the United States October Term, 2018 EDGAR ALONSO PINEDA-PINEDA, Petitioner, V. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Petitioner Edgar Alonso Pineda-Pineda asks that a writ of certiorari issue to review the opinion and judgment entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on September 27, 2018.

Docket Entries

2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2019)

Attorneys

Edgar A. Pineda-Pineda
Laura G. GreenbergFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
Laura G. GreenbergFederal Public Defender's Office, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent