Was the Arizona state courts' decision that the absence of the petitioner's trial counsel during two 'critical stages' of the trial did not require automatic reversal of the petitioner's conviction, in conflict with relevant decisions of this Court?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Was The ARIZONA STATE. COURTS decision that the absence OF the Patitioners trial Gounsel during two ComMiet ‘Critical Staaes” oF the tal did not Veauire auto matic reversal 0F Ane Petrionens CORVIGTION,. IN GONFLIGL With ralevant GeGISIONS OF this COLUIMS Holdings: “ IF AN AGCHASED COUNSEL TS ADSENT OURRING A “GRITICAL. STAGE OF A PROCEEDINGS” REVERSAL. oF THe. CONVICTION I6 AUTOMATIC” il