Robert L. Clark v. Christopher M. Carr, Attorney General of Georgia
How Could the US. Court of Appeals grant a leave to proceed in forma pauperis in US. Court of Appeals Case no.18-10949 under the 'imminent danger' standards shown by the petitioner, and not grant the petitioner Verma in forma pauperis under the same imminent danger standards condition shown by the petitioner in US. Court of Appeals no.18-13010-C
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 4. How Could the US. Court of Ropeals grant a leave to proceed. 1a Veena... Pauperis ‘an US. Court of Mppeald Case n0118-i0949°S under the ‘mminent danger Sandord Conditions Shown by dhe pektioaer, and aot gront Mhe petitioner Verma. Pouperis under the Same imminest. donger Standards Condon Grown by Yne petitioner ‘wn US, Courk of Kopenlo no \81301I0-C% & Io the adkorney genecal ‘eamuned. Qeow a \A&% even ik Wig Guocdunotes Violate Clearly aotoblighedQederal, \awe’ ; _ 4. Does She U5. Couch of Nopenle hove bo uphold Wo own cubiags iw Drown N Sorngon, 38%, 3a iAH 1990, Lilth Cie Qootl) and correctly apply Ye ‘eneminenct dangex Stondord bo all ComeS Yack worrant wh, Ke Aho pekitiones'o comet a