Whether the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals erred in dismissing petitioner's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition challenging his state court convictions as untimely filed, despite the district court's failure to provide notice and an opportunity to respond prior to dismissal, in violation of due process and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

No question identified. : , (Meson beesen Teas _ Me Onan lls peli tioner herein, Srl fare cushy Ped ul 2254 Hobess (shins Chadlenging tis Grvichols anising gut of Alo distactleh bgt tidbit Hass, On pal! je Lob , Mk Cauwhley facered Ke chstect Curts grdleR cbismissing his 2254 potted Challeng bis Gralcbols je Hhpeulll, VAe 14 “fed sleek Clk memo opnias ) if idas Aselercd Jvc te fiet bine Yd Mk. Brankeq5 Créonge Cou, vA iN Wheh Ha Vet of CeRtiotor slsned , lh disrissed « “fee Gounbley rmmechalely in foamed He disteel Guat of ( Ick sfndke, x respolse y A bs miesel pedee and Imsmorarehen. dp Od las Pealaedecle Upon facsidina Sieh, mle, Brawllsy Jelecl ) m the olaherd Cou dus nol fo aya cmp by A mupos rd Reopens the, Tint, Tile Ad Appeal » The ih Lust he dined 4 We ype Presa Yok 4 Iackeal ee ne dle So anel ue anf reall yd be Unnecess ; & Hien penoblag Mohai To Keope) Was Unhmssy } his ase! the pRsselis the fig hushed, a my Ded He Fourth Gell buck ob Appeals ev0 xr Yat MK Branbhey's fereltly malo to ie Was ural 2 i Poe . i ‘ ; > i