No. 18-8225
Barry Druilhet, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing judicial-discretion obstruction-of-justice sentencing sentencing-enhancement witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a federal court consider enhance a defendant's sentence for obstruction of justice where the defendant was seeking out witnesses to testify on his behalf?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Can a federal court consider enhance a defendant’s sentence for obstruction of justice where the defendant was seeking out witnesses to testify on his behalf?
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-02-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2019)
Attorneys
Barry Druilhet, Jr.
Shelley Ann Goff — Goff and Goff Attomeys, Petitioner
Shelley Ann Goff — Goff and Goff Attomeys, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent