Whether the Supreme Court erred in denying the petitioner's request for discretionary review under the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA) standards

No question identified. : ae Lap Tle los Sispeeute Cover fiz) rs_Dste&tioat utters cee PR MENTS AS Su R STAN Te Be DEK Wis. MoT Petal Feeoe ww ZL FE Th stews Syo5eeme Caer Meuse Tos Diseeetion’ UMeee et pe Heaasoy Aninerren tal sPen 7 eles Tél kbos.Aomssinic Haid a Jiachese Wicabil Hesesa4 alas Amsansesise 18 Len pdett Benenson was domated Teo et bun Soats Gren Sir FEST. Batra ee Vilees 1 No peesetal hinuuentat Lctiaermen Tan Cataro Si Testaments } Baden wes ler Croseis) Bet enenD Censeeeahnoy de Did THE as Speen (ort eer Fre Disceers Nc a EA STATEMENT ANP. ~ IW = Couper TEST Aone Abas A necitey oon EEN CE CUR MG DENTON ERS I ie Mecer Ariemsn. THE pppeecare tases Riles. Thal THE. an Fis. Petre ip Doo .Net DENY Detctieal Se Dee! peat rd EN RE an parties appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. [ ] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of ' all