No. 18-8230

Montgomery Carl Akers v. United States

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-procedure constitutional-rights counsel-of-choice court-procedure due-process fifth-amendment jurisdiction legal-obstruction record standing
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does petitioner/appellant/defendant have a constitutional right under the Fifth Amendment due process clause to have his case heard by the district court and appellate court based upon accurate information developed in the record?

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. DOES HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT UNDER THE FIFTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE TO HAVE © HIS CASE HEARD BY THE DISTRICT COURT AND APPELLATE COURT BASED UPON ACCURATE INFORMATION DEVELGPED IN THE RECORD 2 2. DOES THE DISTRICT COURT AND APPELLATE COURT ERR WHEN THEY MANUFACTURE, DISTORT, OR MISCHARACTERIZE THE RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT IN ORDER TO FIND THAT THEY LACK JURISDICTION TO HEAR THE PROCEEDINGS ? 3. DOES THE DISTRICT COURT ERR AS WELL AS THE APPELLATE COURT WHEN THEY FAIL TO EXERCISE THEIR AUTHORITY:TO ENSURE THAT IS NOT BEING OBSTRUCTED IN HIS ABILITY TO HIRE COUNSEL OF HTS CHOICE TO REPRESENT HIM: ~IN HIS PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT(S) ? ,

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED. Justice Kagan and Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-11-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2019)
2018-10-31
Application (18A463) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until November 29, 2018.
2018-09-04
Application (18A463) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 30, 2018 to November 29, 2018, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.

Attorneys

Montgomery Carl Akers
Montgomery Carl Akers — Petitioner
Montgomery Carl Akers — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent