Montgomery Carl Akers v. United States
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Does petitioner/appellant/defendant have a constitutional right under the Fifth Amendment due process clause to have his case heard by the district court and appellate court based upon accurate information developed in the record?
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1. DOES HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT UNDER THE FIFTH AMENDMENT DUE PROCESS CLAUSE TO HAVE © HIS CASE HEARD BY THE DISTRICT COURT AND APPELLATE COURT BASED UPON ACCURATE INFORMATION DEVELGPED IN THE RECORD 2 2. DOES THE DISTRICT COURT AND APPELLATE COURT ERR WHEN THEY MANUFACTURE, DISTORT, OR MISCHARACTERIZE THE RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND EVIDENCE BEFORE THE COURT IN ORDER TO FIND THAT THEY LACK JURISDICTION TO HEAR THE PROCEEDINGS ? 3. DOES THE DISTRICT COURT ERR AS WELL AS THE APPELLATE COURT WHEN THEY FAIL TO EXERCISE THEIR AUTHORITY:TO ENSURE THAT IS NOT BEING OBSTRUCTED IN HIS ABILITY TO HIRE COUNSEL OF HTS CHOICE TO REPRESENT HIM: ~IN HIS PROCEEDINGS BEFORE THE COURT(S) ? ,