Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit abused its discretion in denying a certificate of appealability on the denial of the Sixth Amendment right to effective assistance of counsel claim when state law limits the adjudication of such claims to collateral review

No question identified. : | Quéstnow PRESENTED pe / Dil The Un ted STATE CourT OF APERL | FAK Crrowt Abuse jt disceatiom of of Denying a Cect£yesde. of App es lait OF clena/ of the Svydk Amend ment of 4h Unted Stete Constrtutior. and dik not 4h The Mew L Aus Wad: tied the unqual:teA Stetemen ft fh Case Jaw tAat Gn attornes, [phorance or thactvertente. [h A Pastcorwetim Proceeds oes hot qus Irby 4s Cause +o exlCuse & , procedure! debrult, When a Ste fe torus . li mds the Ad ud cation of Claim of fhm . ellective ASS stance of tro, / Counse/ to Collatecal pevjeuw. 2 Prisoner He9 bStalhy Cause Lur Pru Cera ( Helnult rt Cl) th Stet Court hil not pp ord Counn/ fevirew = Co /laterg/ Peuceeding Or Afters eel . Questor = PRESEATED frre pase 2 Gpyvinted Counse/ [py Fiad Pro ceed ny Lys /nellectve Under 42. Strick lea Stanclards Ah 2 4k Und erly jing Cla, ; 5 A Substantys/ One Usbeb is te S49 thot +ihe Claim fas Some Weds? See Buck Vv: Lorre Davis Dr ecto OF Texas 37 3.e+ 795. 197 LEA. 24. ba?) Bhd [artiver Vv kon S66 Us. 1 132. Ct (209 [82 LEY IA 272 | [reving Vi thaler SEF UWS MRP Se#19H/