No. 18-8243

In Re Andre David Leffebre

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2019-03-05
Status: Dismissed
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment 5th-amendment civil-procedure due-process equal-protection standing appeals civil-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus standing
Key Terms:
Immigration
Latest Conference: 2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether civil procedure rules should be applied to habeas corpus proceedings

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

estion(s) Present ed. Vo; eo. 6 A Rx SfeJSidal 2p gare 2ess5 which Ke leltake eM lh ee Sees a6) ri a oT A hj Nab Ex Lk A. Lad | vs ng : Lap Widtlued, a <— LS Saye bv Le lel. ftom _l_Si Af S ° Bra £18 al 1300AN pry — $$$ » ails ae a Belden Yaad La Ae! Gale he Jexal dutsiheg [OPE mae eel cara neti _ Qvestrenc PResested | | be ) he . Guvekavaente;: tA okhkog | S___Op" fhe — [Ana t___oa a tee Rep | Jaga idicllagh loony, doe YY eid GUP be dazed ae a fast mas yp a | : Ca tteatfen)— of fing aagphare. | a hy etn, 1h, halfed — ot — | liagt of © Gyperats toe ht, ei w|i Ligoat be Leisad” Whanssety tr — oe a a linear, TLL ib ta, GOTGI? | Te -_ Grrl Dp rgyp 8 — | |

Docket Entries

2019-03-25
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2018-12-27
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Andre Leffebre
Andre Leffebre — Petitioner
Andre Leffebre — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent