No. 18-8245
Gary Casdell Fite v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 18-usc-2113 18-usc-924 armed-bank-robbery bank-robbery categorical-approach crime-of-violence elements-clause federal-bank-robbery general-intent general-intent-crime section-2255 sentencing-enhancement
Key Terms:
Takings HabeasCorpus
Takings HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can federal bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) be a crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), where the offense does not require any intentional use, attempted use, or threat of violent physical force?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Can federal bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a) and (d) be a crime of violence under the elements clause of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(3)(A), where the offense does not require any intentional use, attempted use, or threat of violent physical force? i
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-11
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2019-02-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Gary Casdell Fite
Heather Marie Angove — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Heather Marie Angove — Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States of America
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent