Does Rooker Feldman bar a disbarred attorney from seeking damages and equitable relief under Sec. 1983

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW (1) Does Rooker Feldman bar a disbarred attorney from seeking damages and : | | equitable relief under Sec. 1983, due to alleged violations of his federal rights during the state proceedings when the order of disbarment was entered by : the Louisiana Supreme Court while hearing the case initially, and not on ; : _ review from a lower court, and not granting the disbarred attorney a predisbarment hearing, and whose rules do not provide for any hearing or appeal of such order? . (2) Because the defendant only filed a 12(b)(1) motion based on the Rooker Feldman doctrine, which such motion was granted by the District Court, did ; the Appellate Court commit error in dismissing Appellants claims which . . were not subject to Rooker Feldman? . : . (8) Was the Honorable District Court Judge Maurice Hicks required to recuse himself due to his prior appointment by the Louisiana Supreme Court to its Committee on Admissions? | (4) Did the Panel err in not addressing the other rulings of District Court such as the Default Judgment and Plaintiffs Motion to file an Amended Complaint? PARTIES : All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. A list of all