No. 18-8254
Eddie Earl Phillips v. Mississippi
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-provisions constitutional-rights conviction criminal-procedure due-process habitual-offender indictment jury-instructions sentencing statement-of-the-case statutory-provisions
Key Terms:
Securities
Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-03-22
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether Phillips' Conviction and Sentence stems from a defective indictment, in violation of his due process rights?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Phillips’ Conviction and Senlence sTens frm a defective indictment, in Violation of Ars due process rights? wee FeTitioner anSwers, Yes. Whether Phill: ps’ ‘ndicTmenT was improperly amended tT Sentence him aS a hhabiToal offender, jin Violation of Wis doe process rights? . we oe Pet Noner answers, Yes. whether Phi fli ps’ Conviction god Sentence derived from Confosing gnd Misleading gery nslruchons, in vio lation of iS dve process righTs ¢ cee fete tioner answers, Yes.
Docket Entries
2019-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.
2019-03-05
Waiver of right of respondent Mississippi to respond filed.
2019-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2019)
Attorneys
Eddie E. Phillips
Eddie E. Phillips — Petitioner
Mississippi
Abbie Eason Koonce — Office of the Attorney General, Respondent