No. 18-826
Kenneth Shelton v. Anthonee Patterson
Response Waived
Tags: church-autonomy first-amendment hosanna-tabor hosanna-tabor-v-eeoc intra-church-disputes intra-church-litigation jones-v-wolf judicial-scrutiny leadership-succession neutral-principles religious-dispute serbian-eastern-orthodox-diocese-v-milivojevich
Latest Conference:
2019-02-15
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether this Court should clarify Jones v. Wolf and Hosanna-Tabor v. E.E.O.C., given the doctrinal uncertainty and unpredictability reflected in inconsistent application in federal and state courts, and limit the ability of courts to disregard core church autonomy principles in the adjudication of intra-church disputes.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether this Court should clarify Jones v. Wolf and Hosanna-Tabor v. E.E.O.C., given the doctrinal uncertainty and unpredictability reflected in inconsistent application in federal and state courts, and limit the ability of courts to disregard core church autonomy principles in the adjudication of intra-church disputes
Docket Entries
2019-02-19
Petition DENIED.
2019-01-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/15/2019.
2019-01-09
Waiver of right of respondent Anthonee J. Patterson to respond filed.
2018-12-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 1, 2019)
2018-10-22
Application (18A408) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 28, 2018.
2018-10-16
Application (18A408) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 29, 2018 to December 28, 2018, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
Anthonee J. Patterson
Anthonee J. Patterson — Respondent
Kenneth Shelton
Danielle Banks — Stradley, Ronon, et al., Petitioner