No. 18-8260
Kenton Deon Harrell v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-claim criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection evidentiary-hearing free-speech habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance post-conviction-relief standing statutory-interpretation takings
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-03-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower court erred in its interpretation and application of the relevant legal principles
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
No question identified. : QUESTION , This Court's holding and 28 U.S.C. § 2255(b) require a § 2255 court to “conduct an evidentiary hearing unless the record and filings conclusively prove — that the move is not entitled to relief. Mr. Harrell alleged that his attorney's allegations entitle Mr. Harrell to en evidentiary hearing rather than summary disposition? -i
Docket Entries
2019-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/29/2019.
2019-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 3, 2019)
2018-12-31
Application (18A676) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 25, 2019.
2018-12-15
Application (18A676) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 31, 2018 to February 25, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.
Attorneys
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent