No. 18-8270
Wylmina Hettinga v. Timothy P. Loumena
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-procedure civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process liberty-interest minor-child monetary-judgment parental-visitation standing vexatious-litigant
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-06-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a vexatious litigant have a reasonable opportunity to know the claims of the opposing party, who the opposing party is, and to rectify a monetary judgment made in favor of the non-existent opposing party and a denial of a constitutionally protected liberty interest of visitation with a minor child?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Does a vexatious litigant right have a reasonable opportunity to know the claims of the opposing party, who the opposing party is, and to rectify a monetary judgment made in favor of the non-existent opposing party and a denial of a constitutionally protected liberty interest of visitation with a minor child?
Docket Entries
2019-06-24
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.
2019-05-29
Petitioner complied with order of May 13, 2019.
2019-05-13
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 3, 2019, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2018-11-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2019)