No. 18-8273
Cecilio Cuero Payan v. United States
Tags: conflict-free-attorney conflict-of-interest criminal-defendant criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel plea-agreement right-to-counsel sixth-amendment waiver
Key Terms:
JusticiabilityDoctri
JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2019-05-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether, under the sixth amendment, a criminal defendant may waive his right to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel as part of a plea-agreement, where he has not been provided with a conflict free attorney to counsel him as to the advisability of doing so?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, under the sixth amendment, a criminal defendant may waive his right to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel as part of a plea-agreement, where he has not been provided with a conflict free attorney to counsel him as to the advisability of doing so? |
Docket Entries
2019-06-03
Petition DENIED.
2019-05-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2019.
2019-05-10
Reply of petitioner Cecilio Cuero Payan filed.
2019-05-06
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-03-28
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 6, 2019.
2019-03-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 5, 2019 to May 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-03-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2019)
Attorneys
Cecilio Cuero Payan
Dane Kristofor Chase — Chase Law Florida P.A., Petitioner
Dane Kristofor Chase — Chase Law Florida P.A., Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent