Whether the United States has a substantial interest in preventing the risk of injustice to defendant and an interest in the public's confidence in the judicial process not being undermined

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; 1. WHETHER THE UNITED STATES HAS A SUBSTANTIAL INTEREST IN PREVENTING THE RISK OF INJUSTICE TO DEFENDANT AND ANINTEREST IN THE PUBLIC’S CONFIDENCE IN THE JUDICIAL PROCESS ; NOT BEING UNDERMINED? 2. WHETHER THE STATE COURT’S DECISION CONCERNING BRADY LAW WAS AN UNREASONABLE APPLICATION OF CLEARLY ESTABLISHED : . FEDERAL LAW AS DETERMINED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT? 3. WHETHER THE STATE COURTS ENTERED A DECISION IN CONFLICT WITH ITS RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURES, DECISIONAL LAW AND CONSTITUTION ON THE SAME IMPORTANT MATTER AS WELL AS DECIDED AN IMPORTANT FEDERAL QUESTION ON NEWLY PRESENTED EVIDENCE IN A WAY THAT CONFLICTS WITH THIS COURT AND DEPARTED FROM THE ACCEPTED AND USUAL COURSE OF JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS AND FEDERAL LAW? a. WHETHER THE SUPERIOR’S COURT’S DECISION THAT CHARGING INSTRUMENT IS NOT NEWLY PRESENTED EVIDENCE IS AN UNREASONABLE DETERMINATION OF FACTS IN LIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED TO ; THE STATE COURT AND AN UNREASONABLE APPLICATION OF FEDERAL , LAW AS DETERMINED BY THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT? 4, DID THE STATE COURT WILLFULLY FAIL TO DECIDE AN IMPORTANT QUESTION OF FEDERAL LAW AND THE CONSTITUTION ON FRAUD ON ; THE COURT WHICH HAS BEEN SETTLED BY FEDERAL LAW AND BY THIS COURT? : i.