No. 18-8282
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review certificate-of-appealability due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel judicial-discretion sixth-amendment strickland-standard strickland-v-washington
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Court of Appeals err in denying a certificate of appealability on the petitioner's claim which was brought pursuant to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Did the Court of Appeals err in denying a certificate of appealability on the petitioner’s claim which was brought pursuant to Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984)? i
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-20
Waiver of right of respondent State of Oregon to respond filed.
2019-02-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2019)
Attorneys
Jason Wright
State of Oregon
Benjamin Noah Gutman — Oregon Department of Justice, Respondent