No. 18-8283
Terry A. Burlison v. Pam Angus, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as a Marion County, Florida Court Deputy Clerk
IFP
Tags: 42-usc-1983 absolute-immunity civil-rights clearly-established-law due-process immunity official-liability pre-seizure-conduct property-loss property-rights section-1983 seizure
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment Patent
SocialSecurity FourthAmendment Patent
Latest Conference:
2019-05-09
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a public official is protected by absolute immunity under 42 U.S.C. 1983 when their pre-seizure conduct violates clearly established law and causes the loss of property
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Under 42 U.S.C. 1983 when a public official violates clearly established law though her pre-seizure conduct and the conduct caused the loss of property is the official protected by absolute immunity. I
Docket Entries
2019-05-13
Petition DENIED.
2019-04-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.
2019-04-17
Reply of petitioner Terry A. Burlison filed. (Distributed)
2019-04-04
Brief of respondent PAM ANGUS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A MARION COUNTY DEPUTY CLERK in opposition filed.
2019-02-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2019)
Attorneys
PAM ANGUS, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS A MARION COUNTY DEPUTY CLERK
Michael John Roper — Bell & Roper, P.A., Respondent
Michael John Roper — Bell & Roper, P.A., Respondent