Whether the trial judge violated the Petitioner's due process rights by failing to conduct an independent inquiry into the Petitioner's fitness, and whether the imposition of a life sentence on a 17-year-old with depression and rehabilitative potential constitutes cruel and unusual punishment

No question identified. : | tho vi lan _at due Process etrial judge to rely pure Ain OM nlan | 2 ing any indegeadeat inguiry into the Pettoner's Fitness, . \ ifecvel aad vausual punishment to sentence a ltyear ald to aa vexressive . oO . ill 22 de o lite sentence, uthere the Petitroner sicugeles with depression ~ 5 has expressed hrs remo 2 Aha trang Sanu; ‘es, and 4 oe rehabilitative . . lee ential given bis-young age. . : —_— i . . ; ee | Propria. P. oo . inors Atterney General ee _ . ; . _ ae W100 Wt, Rardsalak Street ee —= = 7 rs oy _ | . a : ABLE OF CONT, a LO ue O Me y Q : fa . | X_OF AUTHORETIE ¢ __ iv. : OP ZO : L : | cow r rrowAlL PROVESTONS AND STATUTES. 2. _ : TATE MENT OF THE PASE —_ : : He _: a : lL ASO oR RAAIT: WIR. : g. _ Ieowenustoas ; a RO. a | App eadix A> Desision of the Titvia's Appellate Court. : oe _ ; A ; Pe JX 8 bal Denison of the vi Menace Apeallate Lo ct Deny. LA. 5 Rehearing : 7 _ : Aopendix L be Sion of the Tilenors Supee a ra Cnyca uiew . a | puicancs Const. Artrele | Sect 2 : 41S Linas fonst. A vole Sect, 1 1S, 10 _ \ jin’ ampcled atote 7as IL L104 Q . __ ; ‘ _ __ Jing v taliforate, SOS US, WAT 94a) . . i ; _ Leaps issouc, 480 US. ia (1975) . i4 ee , teller» Alabama, 13a 5.tt. 2455 (2012). ; oo = ISI I%,9O caban eride, Sha O.U,S. YR (9010) . a : . 1S ho 1B ; | diteheoek wy Dog ger, 1el WS 293 (1487) ; ib Ieper u Senos, £ 2: 8,55") a005 ; 13 . tN Rewale sang 39 LLL App 3d $33 (9009) Gytd,B 14 _ _— : on Haynes, J74 Ziad Jo4 r $2 . 4 . ee i oatucan, 422 Ti, Ago Aim aooy tg eal tklas, 393 Lh ‘ea J 2057 (2009) : og People v Look doit Lt Ape (dd) 130545 (ait) __ ot oe In ee Clee ga riL-App J 42% (dood) _ _ 1a ; ; . Icon 2 brateray AOIA LL Doo Ust 103540 (2014) a oY — ee pea acer, JI LLAga.3d 2&6 (144 ise a Ieoal lewis, 234 Lildd 39 (2004 _ Ls a a lL, thee _ = People v Lanper, A&3 TilApa.3d & 1996) . S (5-07 ; eople vy Yaungy250 It dnp 5 1493) : _i@17 ‘ Poodle » Thucmoad, 3/7 Ti.Apa Wh , 2000 le -27 a Peeples Robinson, dd! Ti, App.2d lo nl L . — _. i@-12_ Z People Lewin2, De WhAppad 3) (1993) 16 a People v tabhawa ““Wo4 Th App.dd Bhd (4010) ed Ts a a | feiple » Bolyard, i Ltd 583 91S) : 16 [Peonle-v Steffe LEAL J 141 U4 ae . : . pb : _ people vl: ouse, AOS TL ARO" Q f0_(gos) eg “e I pect wHeace's, Alle It Aga List) 141744 (doit) : . 1g-90 oe Ilosepe v Ybaeea, tou re2yp (1s) 4as01 (aol) ig | Peds: Loner ermaine Brazil, £ pe +f, 2 ays that this Honorable Court . : e ea wat otf rertiors ito couiew the judgemeat below, 1 Theo wgiaal judgemen fren uintion of the Pati tianer was appe. ale d +o the : . . | ace ate Co Q: Laas ost Todinial Disteat, Fitts Division which aflirmed the : : Ls. tatal Bisteict wos dened in an unpublished Jearsian and 7s attached hereto . . The judge ment of the decision-of the Appellate Lourt of I Min ois, First Judierat : a if trict was at ppealed ta the Tilaols: S L pre me. Caw ct wthioh las denied in an : i blished decsian and | isatteched hereto as