No. 18-8314
Jose Nino-Carreon v. United States
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure district-court district-court-discretion guidelines plain-error sentencing sentencing-discretion sentencing-guidelines substantial-rights
Key Terms:
Securities Immigration
Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2019-10-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court of appeals that finds a plain Guideline error should ordinarily find an effect on the defendant's substantial rights if the district court does not expressly state that it would have imposed the same sentence under different Guidelines?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED I Whether a court of appeals that finds a plain Guideline error should ordinarily find an effect on the defendant’s substantial rights if the district court does not expressly state that it would have imposed the same sentence under different Guidelines?
Docket Entries
2019-10-07
Petition DENIED.
2019-06-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
2019-06-05
Reply of petitioner Jose Nino-Carreon filed.
2019-05-24
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2019-04-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 24, 2019.
2019-04-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 24, 2019 to May 24, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
2019-03-25
Response Requested. (Due April 24, 2019)
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-03-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2019)
Attorneys
Jose Nino-Carreon
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Kevin Joel Page — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent