No. 18-8325
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance sentencing sentencing-calculation sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment standard-of-review trial-procedure u-s-sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether appellant received the effective assistance of counsel?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED The questions presented here for determination are as follows: 1. Whether appellant received the effective assistance of counsel? 2. Whether appellant’s sentence was properly calculated?
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-10-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2019)
Attorneys
AMAURY VILLA
John Anthony Cirando — DJ & JA CIRANDO PLLC, Petitioner
John Anthony Cirando — DJ & JA CIRANDO PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent