No. 18-8328
Maritza Burgueno-Gonzalez v. United States
Tags: 18-usc-3553(a) 18-USC-3553a criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing district-court district-court-discretion federal-sentencing sentencing-considerations sentencing-disparities smuggling smuggling-scheme unwarranted-sentences
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court violated 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)'s rule that a district court must consider unwarranted sentencing disparities
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Whether the district court violated 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)’s rule that a district court must consider unwarranted sentencing disparities when it refused to : consider the sentences of other defendants who participated in the same smuggling scheme as Petitioner? pretix
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-14
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2019-02-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Maritza Burgueno-Gonzalez
Vincent J. Brunkow — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Petitioner
Vincent J. Brunkow — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Petitioner
United States
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent