No. 18-8346
Danilo Velasquez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeal constitutional-rights criminal-procedure diminished-capacity due-process evidence expert-testimony fundamental-rights life-sentence ninth-circuit sentencing
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the Ninth Circuit fail to protect petitioner's fundamental due process right to present his complete defense?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Did the Ninth Circuit fail to protect petitioner’s fundamental due process right to present his complete defense when it approved the district court’s exclusion of relevant, highly probative and admissible expert testimony that was critical to petitioner’s sole defense, diminished capacity? Did the Ninth Circuit disregard this Court’s clear precedent and violate petitioner’s Due Process rights when it affirmed the imposition of a severe life sentence that was based in part on petitioner’s exercise of his constitutional right to trial and to appeal his conviction?
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-19
Waiver of right of respondent United States of American to respond filed.
2019-03-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2019)
Attorneys
Danilo Velasquez
Mary Elizabeth Pougiales — Pougiales Law Office, Petitioner
United States of American
Noel J. Francisco — Solicitor General, Respondent