No. 18-8370

Lonnie Eugene Lillard v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review conflict-of-interest constitutional-rights criminal-appeal criminal-procedure discretion due-process federal-procedure ninth-circuit self-representation
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

What procedural safeguards are afforded to federal criminal defendants when an Appellate Court panel exercises its discretion in deciding whether or not to allow an individual to proceed by way of self-representation on direct appeal from their criminal convictions?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

question presented in this case is as follows: : What procedural safeguards are afforded to federal criminal defendants when an Appellate Court panel: : exercises its discretion in deciding whether or not . to allow an individual to proceed by way.of self-representation on direct appeal from their. . ; criminal convictions? . : : Did the Federal Court of Appeals for the Ninth , _ Circuit violate due process if the court unjustifiably deprived a defendant's request for self-representation : -on direct appeal from their criminal convictions? :

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2018-12-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 10, 2019)

Attorneys

Lonnie Lillard
Lonnie Lillard — Petitioner
Lonnie Lillard — Petitioner
United States
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent
Noel J. FranciscoSolicitor General, Respondent