Whether the Michigan Supreme Court was objectively unreasonable in application of harmless-error-analysis

Questions Presented for Review I. Whether the Michigan Supreme Court was objectively un . reasonable in application of harmless error analysis and made objectively unreasonable findings of fact in the light of the record? Il. Whether the failure to appoint an identification expert infringed upon the right to present a defense and demied a fair trial? III. Whether the state's court application of Strickland v_ Washington was objectively unreasonable where counseL 's deficiencies prevented advancing the defense and permitted introduction of inadmissable and prejudicial evidence? IV. Whether habeas relief should have been granted upon merits review of significant and odvious issues that were meritorious and reasonably probable to have resulted in a . different outcome? . i a, ; \ °