Whether the officers had reasonable suspicion to seize Mr. Booker Shabazzallah?

No question identified. : tw : WHETHER THE OFFICERS HAD REASONABLE SUSPICION TO SEIZE MR. BOOKER SHABAZZALLAH? WHETHER THE OFFICERS HAD PROBABLE CAUSE 10 CONVERT SEIZURE INTO AN ARREST OF . MR. BOOKER SHABAZZALLAH AND TRANSPORT HIM TO THE POLICE STATION FOR MURDER ; INVESTIGATIVE DETENTION? : WHETHER THE COURTS IMPROPERLY. WEIGHED EVIDENCE AND RESOLVED DISPUTED ISSUES IN FAVOR OF MOVING PARTY IN HOLDING THAT POLICE OFFICERS ACTIONS DID NOT VIOLATE CLEARLY ESTABLISHED LAW? . : . WHETHER MR. BOOKER SHABAZZALLAH STATED A 42 U.S.C.§ 1983CLAIM UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AGAINST DETECTIVE LUCK AND DETECTIVE KEOUGH? WHETHER DETECTIVE LUCK"S AND SGT. JOHNSON'S STATEMENT WERE ADMISSIBLE EVIDENCE FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DISPOSITION’ IN CONFLICT WITH SARTOR V ARKANSAS NATURAL GAS CORP. 321 U.S. 620 (1944)? WHETHER AN UNSWORN STATEMENT OF A DEFENDANT IN A 1983COMPLAINT ATTACHED AS AN EXHIBIT TO PLAINTIFFS PLEADING TO SUPPORT THE PLAINTIFF'S ALLEGATION UNDER FED.R.C.P. 10(c),THAT THE OFFICER MADE THE STATEMENT,BUT NOT THE TRUTH OF THE STATEMENT,BE USED BY THE COURT SUA SPONTE TO DISMISS ‘A: CLAIM AND/OR ESTABLISH ’ : REASONABLE SUSPICION UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT? © >t . . LIST OF -PARTIES { ] All parties appear in the caption of the case on ‘the cover page. [X] All parties do not appear in the caption of the case on the cover page. ; A list of all