Whether the state appellate court's denial of petitioner's extraordinary writ without providing a written reason or citing any precedent supporting its denial violated the petitioner's due process rights and right to meaningful appellate review

No question identified. : ———| Best Presented a [fan the tate appeal court deny ine my Baoclefenal —— git Ay Fado libel, udice and doe paces —— fF appa 125 dil oF my peti Fac an eakaeriigy ——— fui rei 1 give. wien asa a préce — plat 05 by TE dil my Pelion ic A dating — Wie? ‘ f . Po 1 fi [! ft = ~—(—\ rime tn acces sonar te a Ne ae ier my —cead a “tenn ttn tl name List oF Parhes ee [marten Ot OF ae — tient matter tinintnntnnet ae mente g or ea F ; . AL, OF the. Case on the Cover a. (ALL partres appear in the caphan oF IU ISG ONAN COVE ~*tmaetntmannie a nnn i . tenet teen ann att [ee : : F ° : } . {. arcnemes | nonnative rename tts warren nin nin taon tena Attn rani nett utero mene soe een nme ne | tre neater et tesseng nate et nat tenner cements nett fancier seein eager Tote cores ceremnnmenti i eet Geen inn tee = enna cane eee Tee ementte eae eenenreereetn f oor elon trae tate tn een pe etree ne open enn a . . ranean ernest wren teen eta atenenan