No. 18-8387

Delmart E. J. M. Vreeland, II v. David Zupan, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Tenth Circuit
Docketed: 2019-03-12
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conflicting-rulings defendant-rights due-process forfeiture implied-waiver intelligent judicial-discretion knowing right-to-counsel trial-court-procedure voluntary waiver waiver-of-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a trial court violates this Court's requirement that any waiver of counsel be knowing, voluntary and intelligent

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a trial court violates this Court’s requirement that any waiver of counsel be knowing, voluntary and intelligent when it forces a defendant to proceed to trial without counsel, without any forewarning that taking some action, or failing to take some action, will result in the loss of counsel, and in the absence of the court providing some avenue by which a defendant may retain his right to counsel, an issue on which federal and state courts have issued conflicting rulings? i PARTIES The only

Docket Entries

2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-18
Waiver of right of respondents David Zupan, et al. to respond filed.
2019-02-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 11, 2019)

Attorneys

David Zupan, et al.
L. Andrew CooperOffice of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent
L. Andrew CooperOffice of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent
Delmart Vreeland
Lynn Christina HartfieldLaw Office of Lynn C. Hartfield, LLC, Petitioner
Lynn Christina HartfieldLaw Office of Lynn C. Hartfield, LLC, Petitioner