No. 18-8387
Delmart E. J. M. Vreeland, II v. David Zupan, Warden, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: conflicting-rulings defendant-rights due-process forfeiture implied-waiver intelligent judicial-discretion knowing right-to-counsel trial-court-procedure voluntary waiver waiver-of-counsel
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2019-04-12
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a trial court violates this Court's requirement that any waiver of counsel be knowing, voluntary and intelligent
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether a trial court violates this Court’s requirement that any waiver of counsel be knowing, voluntary and intelligent when it forces a defendant to proceed to trial without counsel, without any forewarning that taking some action, or failing to take some action, will result in the loss of counsel, and in the absence of the court providing some avenue by which a defendant may retain his right to counsel, an issue on which federal and state courts have issued conflicting rulings? i PARTIES The only
Docket Entries
2019-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2019-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.
2019-03-18
Waiver of right of respondents David Zupan, et al. to respond filed.
2019-02-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 11, 2019)
Attorneys
David Zupan, et al.
L. Andrew Cooper — Office of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent
L. Andrew Cooper — Office of the Colorado Attorney General, Respondent
Delmart Vreeland
Lynn Christina Hartfield — Law Office of Lynn C. Hartfield, LLC, Petitioner
Lynn Christina Hartfield — Law Office of Lynn C. Hartfield, LLC, Petitioner