Whether Petitioner's Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to counsel are violated

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : . 1.) Whether Petitioner’s Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to counsel are “attached” or otherwise violated during this “adversarial” 29+ years of terrorism by Respondents, euphemistically called “investigation” by Respondents, who illegally and unconstitutionally engage in other unnamed acts of terrorism against Petitioner by daily forging pro-terrorism, pro-violent materials making it appear they originated from Petitioner, then threatening to arrest Petitioner’s attorney, Mark J. Geragos, if he confers with her for purposes of stopping all planks of this terrorism. : 2.) Whether Respondents can be made to cease and desist from all planks of this terrorism temporarily whether enumerated herein or not until Petitioner is allowed to confer with Mr. Geragos who will file the appropriate pleadings to prove and stop all planks of terrorism against her. 3.) Whether POTUS, Congress et al are acting in their personal capacities in preventing Mr. Geragos from conferring with her and forging pro-terrorism materials, not in legitimate executive or legislative activities thus are not immune from prosecution and civil actions while in office. 4.) Whether the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia erred in its : reasons for not hearing this case and in requesting Petitioner file an additional pleading justifying why they should hear this case based on time. 5.) Whether the District Court erred in dismissing Plaintiff's case. : y | . 6.) Whether Petitioner can include costs and damages solely for Respondents’ illegal and unconstitutional acts which prevent her from conferring with her attorney; Mr. Geragos will, once allowed to confer, file appropriate pleadings for full financial costs and damages for all planks of this terrorism against ; Petitioner (such as raping Petitioner with mind-reading equipment 24/7, etc.) vy : , iA